Читать «Недоверчивые умы. Чем нас привлекают теории заговоров» онлайн - страница 194
Роб Бразертон
468
Haidt, J. (2006).
469
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception.
470
.
471
.
472
.
473
Если не указано иначе, вся информация из этого раздела взята: Bugliosi, V. (2007).
474
.
475
.
476
Melley, T. (2000).
477
.
478
.
479
Henslin, J. M. (1967). Craps and magic.
480
Lupfer, M. B., & Layman, E. (1996). Invoking naturalistic and religious attributions: A case of applying the availability heuristic? The representativeness heuristic?
481
Tetlock, P. E., & Lebow, R. N. (2001). Poking counterfactual holes in covering laws: Cognitive styles and historical reasoning.
482
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language.
483
Ebel-Lam, A. P., Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Jones, S. (2010). Balancing causes and consequences: The magnitude-matching principle in explanations for complex social events.
484
Ebel-Lam, A. P., Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Jones, S. (2010). Balancing causes and consequences: The magnitude-matching principle in explanations for complex social events.
485
LeBoeuf, R. A., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Consequence-cause matching: Looking to the consequences of events to infer their causes.
486
McClure, J., Lalljee, M., & Jaspars, J. (1991). Explanations of extreme and moderate events.
487
Spina, R. R., Ji, L.-J., Guo, T., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2010). Cultural differences in the representativeness heuristic: Expecting a correspondence in magnitude between cause and effect.
488
Ebel-Lam, A. P., Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Jones, S. (2010). Balancing causes and consequences: The magnitude – matching principle in explanations for complex social events.