Читать «Кто за главного? Свобода воли с точки зрения нейробиологии» онлайн - страница 166

1 Van В i ем a D. (1997, March 3) A murder in Florida revives an earlier horror and raises questions about the aftermath of punishment. Time. Cm.: http://time.com

2 Spake A. (1997, March 5) Newsreal: the return of Larry Single-ton. Salon. Cm.: http://salon.com

3 Puit G. (2002, January 6) 1978 Mutilation: family relieved by Singletons death. Review-Journal. См.: http://crimeshots.com/VincentNightmare.html

4 Taylor M. (2002, January 1) Lawrence Singleton, despised ra-pisty dies /He chopped off teenager's arms in 19/8. San Francisco Chronicle. Cm.: http://sfgate.com

5 Harrower J. (1998) Applying psychology to crime. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

6 Hackett R. (2003, January 30) A victim, a survivor; an artist. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Cm.: http://seattlepi.com

7 Nisbett R. E. et al. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review. 108 (2): 291-310.

8 Nisbett R. E. (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and Westerners think differently and why (P 2-3,5). NY: Free Press.

9 Hedden T. et al. (2008) Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science. 19 (1): 12-17.

10 Uskul A. K. et al. (2008) Ecocultural basis of cognition: farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105 (25): 8552-8556.

11 Кім H. S. et al. (2010) Culture, serotonin receptor polymorphism and locus of attention. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 5: 212-218.

12 Частная беседа.

13 United Kingdom House of Lords decisions (1843, May 26, June 19). Daniel M’Naghten’s case. Cm.: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/ UKHL/1843/J16.html

14 Weisberg D. S. etal. (2008) The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20: 470-477.

15 Shariff A. F. et al. (2014) Free will and punishment: a mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science. 25 (8): 1563-1570.

16 The President’s council on bioethics (2004). An overview of the impact of neuroscience evidence in criminal law. Cm.: https:// bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/background/neuroscience_ evidence.html

17 Sc alia A. (2002) Atkins v. Virginia (00-8452) 556 U.S. 504. Cm.: https://law.comell.edu/supct/html/00-8452.ZO.html

18 Snead О. C. (2006) Neuroimaging and the courts: standards and illustrative case index. Cm.: http://ncsc.org

19 Talairach P. T., Tournoux P. (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas for the human brain. 3-D proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging (P VII). NY: Thicme Medical Publishers.

20 Miller M. B. et al. (2002) Extensive individual differences in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 14 (8): 1200-1214.

21 Doron C., Gazzaniga M.S. (2009) Neuroimaging techniques offer new perspectives on callosal transfer and interhemi-spheric communication. Cortex. 44 (8): 1023-1029.

22 Putman M.C. et al. (2009) Cortical projection topography of the human splenium: hemispheric asymmetry and individual difference. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22 (8): 1662-1669.