Читать «Wiki-правительство: Как технологии могут сделать власть лучше, демократию – сильнее, а граждан – влиятельнее» онлайн - страница 182

27. Mohammed Kashef, “Scientific Peer Review in the Public Sector,” 2005 (dotank.nyls.edu/communitypatent/peerreview_dec05.pdf [October 2008]).

28. Bolten, “Issuance of OMB’s ‘Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review.’”

29. American Association for the Advancement of Science, “Another Decline for EPA R&D in 2009: AAAS R&D Funding Update on R&D in the FY 2009 EPA Budget” ( [October 2008]).

30. Information Quality Act, P. L. 106–555 app. C, 114 Stat. 2763A-154 (2000); “Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies,” republication, 67 Federal Register 8452 (February 22, 2002).

31. Ibid.

32. Stephen M. Johnson, “Junking the ‘Junk Science’ Law: Reforming the Information Quality Act,” Administrative Law Review 58 (2006): 37–80.

33. Mooney, The Republican War on Science, p. 103.

34. Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch, pp. 69–76; Wendy E. Wagner, “The ‘Bad Science’ Fiction: Reclaiming the Debate over the Role of Science in Public Health and Environmental Regulation,” Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (2003): 67–71; Sidney A. Shapiro, “Politicizing Peer Review: The Legal Perspective,” in Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research, edited by Wendy Wagner and Rena Steinzor (Cambridge University Press, 2006).

35. Bolten, “Issuance of OMB’s ‘Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review,’” p. 6.

36. Alan Charles Raul and Julie Zampa Dwyer, “‘Regulatory Daubert’: A Proposal to Enhance Judicial Review of Agency Science by Incorporating Daubert Principles into Administrative Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (2003): 7 (утверждая, что принципы Дауберта должны применяться к административным органам, они считают, что «оставлять этот вопрос на рассмотрение судей будет менее уважительным, но зато более важным с позиции науки»)см. также Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U. S. 579 (1993).

37. E-Government Act of 2002, H. R. 2458/S. 803, section 206.

38. Beth S. Noveck, “The Electronic Revolution in Rulemaking,” Emory Law Journal 53 (2004): 433.

39. Daniel C. Esty, “Environmental Protection in the Information Age,” New York University Law Review 79 (2004): 172.

40. См.: Stuart W. Shulman and others, “Electronic Rulemaking: A Public Participation Research Agenda for the Social Sciences,” Social Science Computer Review 21 (2003): 163–64; Code of Federal Regulations 36, sec. 219.9.