Читать «А Психологические аспекты юриспруденции» онлайн - страница 310

law and common sense // Psychology, Public Policy and Law. 1997. Vol.3.

an attitude. Attitudinal differences among juveniles toward police // Journal P.428-460.

of Criminal Justice. 2001. Vol.29. P.295-305.

511. Stylianou S. Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: What have 524. Tedeschi J.T., Felston R.B. Criminological theories // Violence, we learned and what else do we want to know // Journal of Criminal Justice.

aggression, and coercive actions. Washington: American Psychological 2003. Vol.31. P.37– 56

Association, 1994. P.127-152.

512. Sue S., Smith R.E., Cadwell C. Effects of inadmissible evidence 525. Terry R.L. Effects of facial transformations on accuracy of on the decisions of simulated jurors: a moral dilemma // Journal of Applied recognition // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1994. Vol.134. P.483-492

Social Psychology. 1973. Vol.3. P.345-353.

526. Thibaut J., Walker L. Procedural justice: a psychological analysis.

513. Sunstein C.R., Hastie R., Payne J.W., Schkade D.A., Viscusi W.K.

Hillsdale, 1975.

Punitive damages: how juries decide. Chicago, London., 2002.

527. Thierry K.L., Spence M.J. A real-life event enhances the accuracy 514. Sunwolf, Seibold D.R. Jurors’ intuitive rules for deliberation: of preschoolers’ recall // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2004. Vol.18.

a structurational approach to communication injury decision making //

P.297–309

Communication Monographs. 1998. Vol.65. P.282-307

528. Tindale R.S., Vollrath D.A., Davis J.H., Nagao D.H., Hinsz V.B.

515. Sykes D.L, Johnson J.T. Probabilistic evidence versus the Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups: a test of three representation of an event: the curious case of mrs. Prob’s Dog // Basic and models // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. Vol.58. P.438-Applied Social Psychology. 1999. Vol.21. P.199–212

149.

516. Tabone C., Pardine P., Salzano J. Why do women accept the rape 529. Tomes J.L., Katz A.N. Habitual susceptibility to misinformation myth? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern psychological and individual differences in eyewitness memory // Applied Cognitive 496

497

Psychology. 1997. Vol.11. P.233-251

542. Vanlear C.A., Mabry E.A. Testing contrasting interaction models 530. Tonry M.H. Malign neglect: race, crime and punishment in for discriminating between consensual and dissentient decision-making America. N.Y., 1995.

groups // Small Group Research. 1999. Vol.30. P.29-58

531. Treuer T., Koperdak M., Rozsa S., Furedi J. The impact of physical 543. Varelas N., Foley L.A. Blacksànd Whites` perceptions of interracial and sexual abuse on body image in eating disorders // European Eating and intraracial date rape // The Journal of social Psychology. 1998. Vol.138.

Disorders Review. 2005. Vol.13. P.106–111

P.392—400.

532. Tsoudis O. (a) The likelihood of victim restitution in mock cases: 544. Vasquez K., Keltner D., Ebenbach D.H., Banaszynski T.L.  Cultural are the ‘rules of the game’ different from prison and probation? // Social variation and similarity in moral rhetorics. Voices from the Philippines and Behavior and Personality. 2000. Vol.28. P.481-498