Читать «А Психологические аспекты юриспруденции» онлайн - страница 295

261. Heppner M.J., Humphrey C.F., Hillenbrand-Gunn T.L., DeBord 272. Horgan T.G., Mast M.S., Hall J.A., Carter J.D. Gender differences K.A. The differential effects of rape prevention programming on attitudes, in memory for the appearance of others // Personality and Social Psychology behavior, and knowledge // Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1995. Vol.42.

Bulletin. 2004. Vol.30. P.185-196

P.508-518

273. Horowitz I.A., Bordens K.S. The consolidation of plaintiffs: the 262. Herek G.M., Gillis J.R., Cogan J.C. Psychological sequelae of effects of number of plaintiffs on jurors` liability decisions. Damage awards hate-crime victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults // Journal and cognitive processing of evidence // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000.

of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1999. Vol.67. P.945-951

Vol.6. P.909-918.

263. Herzog S. Does the ethnicity of offenders in crime scenarios affect 274. Horowitz I.A., Bordens K.S. The effects of jury size, evidence public perceptions of crime seriousness? A randomized survey experiment in complexity, and note taking on jury process and performance in a civil trial Israel // Social Forces. 2003. Vol.82. P.757-781

// Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002. Vol.87. P.121–130

264. Herzog S.  The effect of motive on public perceptions on the 275. Horowitz I.A., Lee L.F., Brolly I. Effects of trial complexity on seriousness of murder in Israel // British Journal of Criminology. 2004.

decision making // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1996. Vol.81. P.757-768

Vol.44. P.771-782

276. Howells K., Day A., Wright S. Affect, emotions and sex offending 265. Herzog S. The relationship between public perceptions of crime

// Psychology, Crime & Law. 2004. Vol.10. P.179-195

seriousness and support for plea-bargaining practices in Israel: a factorial-277. Howells G.N., Flanagan K.A., Hagan V. Does reviewing a televised survey approach // The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2003.

execution affect attitudes toward capital punishment // Criminal Justice and Vol.94. P.103-131

Behavior. 1995. Vol.22. P.411—424.

266. Hess U., Kleck R.E. The cues decoders use in attempting to 278. Hulbert L.G., Parks C.D., Chen X., Nam K., Davis J.H. The differentiate emotion-elicited and posed facial expressions // European plaintiff bias in mock civil jury decision making: consensus requirements, Journal of Social Psychology. 1994. Vol.24. P.367-381.

information format and amount of consensus // Group Processes and 267. Heuer L., Penrod S., Hafer C.L., Cohn D. The role of resource Intergroup Relations. 1999. Vol.2. P.59-77.

and relational concerns for procedural justice // Personality and Social 279. Hunt J.S., Budesheim T.L. How jurors use and misuse character Psychology Bulletin. 2002. Vol.28. P.1468—1482.

evidence // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004. Vol.89. P.347–361

268. Hodson G., Hooper H., Dovidio J.F., Gaertner S.L. Aversive 280. Hymes R.M., Leinart M., Rowe S., Rogers W. Acquaintance rape: racism in Britain: the use of inadmissible evidence in legal decisions //